EHP’s Policy on Originality of Submission
نویسندگان
چکیده
Most peer-review scientific journals will consider only work that has not been published elsewhere (Graf et al. 2007). Consistent with this policy, EHP's Instructions to Authors states that " Contributions submitted to EHP must be original works of the authors(s) and must not have been previously published in print or online or simultaneously submitted to another publication. " According to the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE 2007), there are two principal reasons for such a policy, including 1) the potential for disagreement when two (or more) journals claim the right to publish a manuscript that has been submitted simultaneously to more than one; and 2) the possibility that two or more journals will unknowingly and unnecessarily undertake the work of peer review, edit the same manuscript, and publish the same article. Therefore, a policy on originality of submissions helps to protect against copyright infringements, prevent the waste of valuable resources related to the review and publication process, and guard against possible double counting of a specific set of data or ideas. Over the last two years, EHP has utilized an online search engine to help identify material that may have been published elsewhere. As a result, we discovered several manuscripts that drew heavily from reports or documents already published online by groups such as the World Health Organization, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, or state health or regulatory agencies. Based on our experience with these submissions, we have come to recognize that online publication of internal reports, dissertations, and other documents is not necessarily equivalent to prior publication in a peer-reviewed journal. Clearly, our policy concerning the originality of the submission needs to be updated. To help clarify the conditions under which EHP will accept manu scripts based on materials that have been published online or in print elsewhere, we offer the following guidance. Much of the guidance is based on criteria developed by the ICMJE (2007). EHP has two different standards, one for commentaries and review articles, and one for original research papers. Previously published material may be included in commentaries and review articles, assuming that the original authors have given permission to reproduce the material and all copyright issues have been resolved. For original research articles, previously published schemata or illustrative figures are acceptable with the proper attribution; however, figures or tables of data reproduced exactly from previously published reports or other documents are not acceptable. …
منابع مشابه
EHP Highlights of the Past Year
Approaching the first anniversary of my becoming Editor-in-Chief of EHP, I want to provide an update to our readers and authors about recent events and changes. My first priority is to thank our associate editors and reviewers, who donate their valuable time and expertise to ensure that peer review is fair and rigorous, and who help EHP publish the most credible and important environmental heal...
متن کاملPreprint servers facilitate scientific discourse.
Preprints are scientificmanuscripts posted online before formal peer-review and publication in journals. Preprints have become prominent in scientific publishing, which is increasingly shaped by an emphasis on speed, transparency, and accessibility. Important as they are, those factors are entwined with the journal’s primary role as an arbiter of the rigor and significance of scientific scholar...
متن کاملEHP’s Policy on Integrity of Published Research
volume 117 | number 9 | September 2009 • Environmental Health Perspectives Fifteen years ago, Environmental Health Perspectives (EHP) stated in its Instructions to Authors that scientific integrity would be considered as part of the review process. Since that time, EHP’s policy has gradually evolved, especially with regard to competing financial interests. EHP, like many other journals, is conc...
متن کاملSurgical pathology specimens for gross examination only and exempt from submission: a College of American Pathologists Q-Probes study of current policies in 413 institutions.
OBJECTIVE To survey the scope of current written institutional policies for types of surgical pathology specimens exempt from submission to the laboratory and those that may be examined by gross inspection only. DESIGN AND SETTING In the first quarter of 1997, a total of 413 voluntary participant institutions enrolled in the College of American Pathologists Q-Probes quality improvement progra...
متن کامل